A concerned lady [/b]has posed a question to men, “who will marry us?” as she laments their preference in younger ladies.
The lady, Debbie, in a tweet via her page on X, formerly known as Twitter, yearned to know the reason men prefer to go for the ladies born in the 2000s when they want to settle down, and leave people of her kind who were born in the 1990s.
She wrote, “Men, why are you marrying these kids of the 2000s and leaving us of the 1990s? Who will marry us?😭” This post has generated significant attention and sparked reactions from netizens who offered various reasons for the trend she highlighted.
Among the responses, @egoumez_d pointed out the demands some women have, saying, “When una go carry phone, ‘why I will not date a man that is not wealthy,’ yen yen.” This comment suggests that some women are more focused on wealth than relationships. Meanwhile, @pealz responded by comparing women of different eras to players in football, saying, “No coach will sign current Luka Modric over prime Messi.” This implies that younger women are considered more desirable due to their prime youthfulness. @omoh_aw commented, “Because una character no good.” suggesting that women from the 1990s may have some character flaws. @ifeloverboy gave a more philosophical response, claiming, “Catching them young before they choose your kind of life…It’s easy to fold a fresh fish but dry fish no dey fold. Ire oh.” This refers to the idea of shaping a partner’s life early on, comparing younger women to fresh fish, which is easier to mold compared to older women, who are like dried fish, unchangeable. Lastly, [b]@dr_ignatius_oparaocha offered a more thoughtful perspective, stating, “Marriage isn’t about age. It’s about readiness, commitment, and a shared vision for the future.” This comment brings in the idea that marriage should be about personal qualities and mutual goals, not just age or appearance.[/b]
Renowned content creator, [b]Denilson Igwe seemingly reacts to Mark Angel’s $3.7 million forex trade loss, sparking curiosity among followers and social media users alike.[/b]
Recall that in a recent Instagram post, [b]Mark Angel reflected on 2024, describing it as a tumultuous year [/b]due to his staggering $3.7 million loss in forex trading. This revelation attracted significant attention, with many followers expressing concern and curiosity about the financial setback. Mark Angel's reflection on his difficult year highlighted not just the loss, but also his hopes for recovery and future success despite the setback. The post resonated with many who found themselves sympathizing with his financial challenges.[/b]
However, Denilson Igwe, who has had a complicated history with Mark Angel, has seemingly responded to this revelation through his own [b]Instagram post, fueling speculation about the ongoing tension between the two. The history of their feud, which escalated due to differences in business practices, appears to be resurfacing. Fans and followers of both have eagerly scrutinized their posts, trying to interpret whether the timing of Denilson’s post was intentional or coincidental.[/b]
In his post, Denilson asserted that lies are [b]widespread and some individuals are worse than the devil, a statement that appears to indirectly address Mark Angel’s recent loss and the public reflection on it. The post reads, “Lies na water. Some people are just worse than the devil.” This cryptic message has fueled online speculations about its intent and target. Many have interpreted this as Denilson’s indirect response to Mark’s public sharing of his financial struggles, adding a layer of complexity to the existing rift between the two content creators.[/b]
See below…
Gistreel recalls that in 2024, [b]Mark Angel and Denilson Igwe were embroiled in a highly publicized feud. The feud gained widespread attention after Denilson accused Mark Angel of exploiting his team and providing unfair compensation to his employees. In particular, Denilson alleged that Mark Angel paid Emmanuella, a renowned teen comedian, a meager monthly salary of N20k, despite being part of a crew that reportedly raked in $160,000 monthly. This controversial accusation further strained their relationship and added fuel to the public dispute. The fallout from this disagreement still lingers, influencing how both creators interact publicly, with their followers continuing to take sides and speculate on their personal and professional dynamics.[/b]
